The truth about global warming


. MARK: HELLO, AMERICA. I’M MARK LEVIN. THIS IS “LIFE, LIBERTY & LEVIN.” WELCOME.>>NICE TO SEE YOU.>>IT’S A GREAT HONOR TO SEE YOU, PATRICK MICHAELS. DOCTOR. EXPERT ON ALL THINGS CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENT AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED. LITTLE BIT OF YOUR BACKGROUND. DIRECTOR OF THE STUDY OF SCIENCE AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. YOU HOLD AN AB IN SM, YOU HOLD THOSE DEGREES IN BIOLOGY, SCIENCES AND PLANT ECOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. PRETTY GOOD SCHOOL. Ph.D. IN ECOLOGICAL CLIMATOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN IN MADISON, 1979. PRESIDENT OF THE STATE CLIMATOLOGISTS, PROGRAM CHAIRMAN FOR THE CITY OF APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY OF THE AMERICAN METEORLOGICAL SOCIETY. SAY THAT FAST FIVE TIMES. RESEARCH PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOR 30 YEARS, AND GIVING EXPANSIVE BACKGROUND THAT YOU HAVE, GIVING THAT TO THE PUBLIC SO THEY THAT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU’RE A CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR AND REVIEWER OF THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL PANEL OF CLIMATE CHANGE. WE’VE HEARD IT ALL. WHAT’S GOING ON OUT THERE?>>WELL, SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE PLANET IS WARMER THAN IT WAS 100 YEARS AGO ABOUT. 9/10th OF A DEGREE CELSIUS. MARK: 9/10th DEGREE OF CELSIUS IS THAT A LOT?>>NO. COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY HUMAN BEINGS, WE HAVEN’T PUT ENOUGH CO2 IN THE AIR, AND ONE IN THE LATER PART OF THE 20th CENTURY THAT SLOWS DOWN OR DEPENDS WHOSE DATA YOU USE ONLY TO RESUME WITH THE BIG EL NINO THAT COVERED THE NEWS THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. THAT MEANS THAT PROBABLY HALF, MAYBE HALF OF THAT NINE-TENTHS OF THE DEGREE MIGHT BE CAUSED BY GREENHOUSE GASES. WHEN THE PLANET WARMED BEGINNING 1976, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE STRATOSPHERE STARTED TO STOP, THAT’S THE PREDICTION OF GREENHOUSE THEORY THAT’S NOT INTUITIVE. THE GREAT PHILOSOPHER OF SCIENCE CARL POPPER SAID IF YOU CAN MEET A DIFFICULT PREDICTION WITH YOUR THEORY, YOU CAN CONTINUE TO ENTERTAIN YOUR THEORY. SO THE THEORY IS RIGHT, BUT THE APPLICATION OF IT IS WRONG. IT IS NOWHERE NEAR AS WARM AS IT’S SUPPOSED TO BE. THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE MAKING SYSTEMATIC, DRAMATIC ERRORS OVER THE ENTIRE TROPICS WHICH IS 40% OF THE EARTH, AND IT’S WHERE ALL OUR MOISTURE COMES FROM. ALMOST ALL OF IT. MARK: LET ME STOP YOU THERE. WHO DOES THESE COMPUTER MODELS?>>GOVERNMENTS. THERE ARE 32 FAMILIES OF COMPUTER MODELS THAT ARE USED BY THE UNITED NATIONS. EACH GOVERNMENT SPONSORED. AND ALL OF THEM ARE PREDICTING FAR, FAR TOO MUCH WARMING. THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WHAT’S BEEN PREDICTED TO HAPPEN, WHICH LOOKS LIKE SDMSHGS WHAT IS HAPPENING CONTINUES TO GROW. MARK: WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT?>>YEAH, YOU COULD JUST LOOK AT THE WEATHER BALLOON TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SATELLITE TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING CALLED THE REANALYSIS DATA. THEY BEHAVE IN CONCERT. THEY’RE SHOWING THE SAME THING, AND THE SAME THING IS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN THIS THING. HOWEVER, WE NEED TO CALL THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. MARK: SPECIAL COUNSEL?>>YES, BECAUSE ONE MODEL WORKS. YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS? IT’S THE RUSSIAN MODEL. MARK: LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT. SO ALL THE GOVERNMENT MODELS ARE LIKE THIS?>>YEAH. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL LIKE THIS.>>YEAH. THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING IN IT. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING AND PRETTY MUCH FOLLOWS REALITY. WHAT’S BEEN TESTED OVER A FEW DECADES.>>YEAH, CORRECT. IF WE WERE RATIONAL ABOUT THIS, THINK ABOUT THE DAILY WEATHER FORECAST. YOU WATCH THE WEATHER CHANNEL, THEY GO THIS MODEL SAYS THAT, THAT MODEL SAYS THAT, WE THINK THIS ONE IS WORKING THE BEST, WE’RE GOING TO RELY ON THAT. WELL, FOR CLIMATE FORECAST SHOULD BE USING THE RUSSIAN MODEL BUT WE’RE NOT. WE USE THIS BIG SPATE OF ALL THE OTHER MODELS THAT HAVE THE WARMING THAT’S NOT OCCURRING. MARK: WHY ARE THE OTHER MODELS, 31 OF THEM, WRONG. AND WHY DO THEY ALL GO THE SAME DIRECTION, UP?>>BECAUSE, THEY WHAT ARE IS CALLED PARAMETERIZED. THEY’RE ALL PARAMETERIZED, CAN I TRANSLATE PARAMETERIZED IN ENGLISH? FUDGE. THEY DON’T GET THE RIGHT ANSWER, DON’T KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR CERTAIN PHENOMENA, SO WE ESSENTIALLY PUT IN CODE STEPS THAT GIVE US WHAT WE THINK IT SHOULD BE. AND SYSTEMATIC ERROR THAT WAS MADE WAS THE MODELS WERE TUNED, AS IT SAID. TUNED. TUNED TO SIMULATE THE WARMING OF THE EARLY 20th CENTURY. BEGAN IN 1910, ENDED IN 1945, ABOUT .45 DEGREES CELSIUS. MARK, THAT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CARBON DIOXIDE. MARK: BECAUSE THERE WASN’T ENOUGH.>>WE HAD TO PUT ENOUGH IN THAT THE BACKGROUND CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION IS 280 MILLION PARTS PER MILLION. WHEN THE FIRST WARMING STARTED, 208 PARTS PER MILLION. IF IT IS THAT SENSITIVE TO 18PPM CHANGE IN CO2 WE WOULDN’T BE TALKING ABOUT THIS RIGHT NOW AND WE’D BE SWEATING BULLETS.>>SO WHAT YOU’RE SAYING IS MAN MADE CARBON DIOXIDE THE LAST CENTURY COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED –>>EARLY 20th CENTURY. MARK: COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED THIS HEAT. SO WHAT DID? DO WE KNOW?>>NO. AND THREE MOST IMPORTANT WORDS IN LIFE MAY NOT BE I LOVE YOU. IT MAY BE I DON’T KNOW. I DON’T THINK ANYBODY REALLY KNOWS WHAT KICKED OFF THAT WARMING. THERE’S LOTS OF THEORIES. ONE IS THAT IT WAS THE FINAL ESCAPE FROM A GOLD PERIOD, MULTICENTURY PERIOD KNOWN AS THE LITTLE ICE AGE. THAT’S THE PLAUSIBILITY, WHY DID IT HAPPEN THEN. BUT WE DON’T HAVE A GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THAT. BECAUSE WE FORCED THE COMPUTER MODELS TO SAY, HUMAN INFLUENCE, CO2 AND OTHER STUFF. WE MADE THE MODELS TOO SENSITIVE, AND SO THAT’S WHY WHEN YOU GET TO THE LATE 20th CENTURY, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY’RE WARMING UP LIKE CRAZY AND THE REALITY IS DOWN HERE. IT WAS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS WAS REVEALED IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE IN LATE 2016, AND THERE WAS A PAPER PUBLISHED BY A FRENCH CLIMATE MODELER CALLED THE ART AND SCIENCE OF CLIMATE MODEL TUNING. AND IN IT, HE SPEAKS OF PARAMETERIZING. WE COULD SAY FUDGING, THE MODELS TO GIVE, HIS WORDS, AN ANTICIPATED ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF RESULTS. SO IT’S THE SCIENTIST, NOT THE SCIENCE THAT’S DETERMINING HOW MUCH IT’S GOING TO WARM. LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T KNOW THIS, BUT IT HAPPENS TO BE TRUE, AND YOU KNOW, WE COULD SPECULATE AS TO WHY THAT PAPER WAS PUBLISHED RIGHT BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTION? I WOULDN’T WANT TO IMPUTE CAUSATION, BUT GEE — MARK: BUT I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT CAUSATION.>>SURE. MARK: HAVE YOU 31 GOVERNMENTS.>>THE 31 DIFFERENT MODELS.>>31 DIFFERENT MODELS. MULTIPLE GOVERNMENTS.>>RIGHT. MARK: FUDGING THE NUMBERS?>>NOT FUDGING THEM PARAMETERIZING. MARK: YOU USED THE WORD FUDGING. DOES OUR EPA DO THAT? DOES NASA DO THAT? WHO DOES THAT FOR US?>>GOOD QUESTION, MARK, BECAUSE THE EPA WAS TOLD BY THE SUPREME COURT IN 2007 THAT IF IT FOUND THE CARBON DIOXIDE ENDANGERED HUMAN HEALTH AND WELFARE, THAT IT HAD THE POWER TO REGULATE IT UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT. MARK: THIS IS THE MASSACHUSETTS.>>THE EPA. WELL, THEY PRODUCED AN ENDANGERMENT FINDING, 2009, AND THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING FOR PROSPECTIVE CLIMATE IS 100%, I DIDN’T SAY 90%. I SAID 100% BASED ON THOSE MODELS. SO IF YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT THOSE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY ARE NOT WORKING, YOU CAN TAKE DOWN THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING, AND THAT WOULD BE THE BASIS FOR ALL THOSE POLICIES THAT CAME OUT OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. MARK: WHICH WOULD MEAN YOU DON’T GET TO REGULATE –>>ABSOLUTELY. MARK: — CARBON DIOXIDE.>>ABSOLUTELY, THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING IS THE HEART OF THE MATTER. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA HOW GUNG HO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WAS ON THIS ISSUE. IF YOU LISTEN TO HIS FIRST INAUGURAL SPEECH, JANUARY 20, 2009, IT’S SECOND SUBSTANTIVE PARAGRAPH OF THE SPEECH IS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING, AFTER HEALTH CARE. 90 DAYS AFTER HE FINISHED THAT SPEECH, HIS EPA PRODUCED A PRELIMINARY FINDING OF ENDANGERMENT FROM CARBON DIOXIDE. THEY WERE WORKING ON THIS BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT, BUREAUCRATS CAN’T WORK THAT FAST, AND THEN THE FINAL FINDING WAS MADE IN DECEMBER FOR THE CLIMATE CONFERENCE IN COPENHAGEN THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO PRODUCE ANOTHER GLOBAL WARMING. MARK: SO YOU’RE TELLING US THAT WE HAVE A MASSIVE BIT OF PUBLIC POLICY THAT HAS ENORMOUS EFFECT ON SOCIETY THAT’S BUILT ON — I’LL USE MY WORDS, PHONY MODELS.>>BUILT ON A HOUSE OF CARDS. MODELS REALLY DON’T WORK. IF I COULD REALLY BE ARCANE, I COULD EXPLAIN THE MECHANISM AS TO WHY THEY DON’T WORK. MARK: AS LONG AS I UNDERSTAND IT.>>THE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY PREDICT THAT AS YOU GO UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE IN THE TROPICS WHICH ARE 40% OF THE EARTH THAT THE TEMPERATURE SHOULD RISE DRAMATICALLY AS YOU GO FURTHER UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE. SO WHEN YOU GET TO THE LEVEL OF THE JET STREAM, THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE PREDICTING SEVEN TIMES. I DIDN’T SAY SEVEN-TENTHS OF A DEGREE, I SAID SEVEN TIMES MORE WARMING THAN BEING OBSERVED. WHY AM I BORING YOU WITH THAT? THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF TEMPERATURE DETERMINES PRECIPITATION, AND GUESS WHAT? ALMOST ALL THE ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE THAT WE HAVE AROUND US TODAY IN THE HUMID WASHINGTON, D.C., THAT COMES FROM THE TROPICS. SO IF YOU GET THAT VERTICAL MOTION WRONG, DOWN THERE, YOU GET ALL THE SUBSEQUENT VARIABLES WRONG. IT’S A FANTASTIC SYSTEMATIC ERROR, AND AGAIN, THAT ALONG WITH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SURFACE TEMPERATURES ARE RATHER THE LOWER ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES THAN WHAT’S BEING OBSERVED, THAT’S SUFFICIENT TO THE CHEMICAL FINDING. MARK: TO THE AVERAGE PEDESTRIAN LIKE ME, IF YOU GET THAT WRONG, WHAT DOES IT MEAN? YOU GET THE WEATHER MODELS WRONG?>>THE SUBSEQUENT WEATHER WRONG. THAT’S WHY, IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THESE FAMILIES OF MODELS, THEY PREDICT RADICALLY DIFFERENT CHANGES IN PRECIPITATION FROM MODEL TO MODEL. WELL, PROBABLY BECAUSE THEY GOT THE PRECIPITATION INITIALIZATION OUT OF TROPICS WRONG. PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT. I OFFER YOU WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, IF AN EXAMPLE PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT COMING FROM THE TROPICS, GET THAT WRONG AND YOU GET THAT THING.>>IS WEATHER GETTING WORSE?>>NO. I LOVE THAT QUESTION BECAUSE WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT. ROGER PILKE, JR., AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DOES. THIS YES, THERE’S MORE DAMAGE FROM WEATHER BECAUSE THERE’S MORE STUFF AND PEOPLE AND PROPERTY IN THE WAY OF WEATHER. SO WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT ARE WEATHER DAMAGES AS A PERCENT OF GDP. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THAT WAY, THERE’S NOTHING WHATSOEVER. I’M SURE HURRICANES ARE GETTING WORSE. I HEARD THAT ON EVERY LEGACY NETWORK DURING FLORENCE AND HARVEY AND ALL THAT STUFF. WELL, FACT OF THE MATTER IS, THERE’S A GUY BY THE NAME OF RYAN MAUI, A HOT SHOT YOUNG TROPICAL METEOROLOGIST, AND A SCHOLAR AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. HE TRACKS THE ENERGY IN THE TROPICAL CYCLONES. SINCE WE GOT GLOBAL RECORDS THAT BEGAN IN 1970, AND YOU WOULD THINK THERE WOULD BE SOME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THAT INTEGRATED ENERGY AND GLOBAL WARMING AFTER ALL, IT’S ONLY LOGICAL. VICE PRESIDENT GORE SAYS THAT MUST BE THE CASE. IT’S NOT. THERE’S NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER BETWEEN THE ACCUMULATED CYCLONE ENERGY AND THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH. IT’S JUST NOT THERE. NOW, WHAT — WAIT A MINUTE, J DOES OUR GOVERNMENT SAY THIS? THEY SAID IT IN THEIR LAST REPORT CALLED GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES. THEY SAID, OH, THERE’S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN HURRICANE POWER IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN FROM 1970 TO 2009 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. 1980 TO 2009. WAIT A MINUTE. WHY DID YOU STOP IN 2009. IT’S 2014 REPORT. BECAUSE IF YOU TAKE THE DATA AFTER 2009, THE INCREASE GOES BACK TO WHERE IT WAS. WHY DID YOU START IN THE MID 1970s, BECAUSE WE HAVE RECORDS THAT ARE REALLY GOOD BACK TO 1920. IF YOU LOOK AT 1920 TO 1950, YOU SEE AN INCREASE THAT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ONE THAT OCCURS. MARK: SO THE INFORMATION THEY’RE PROVIDING US –>>IS SKEWED. IT’S SKEWED. THEY’RE CHERRY PICKING. MARK: HERE WE RELY ON THE CLIMATOLOGISTS AND THEY ARE HYPERPOLITICAL. TONIGHT GET BACK TO THAT AS SOON AS WE RETURN.>>>DON’T FORGET, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU CAN WATCH LEVIN TV ALMOST EVERY WEEK NIGHT BY

45 thoughts on “The truth about global warming

  • September 29, 2019 at 3:57 am
    Permalink

    I love breathing dirty air! It makes me more conservative.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 4:04 am
    Permalink

    I remembered this interview during the recent climate summitt with the poor frightened Gretta Thernberg

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 4:06 am
    Permalink

    The inventor of the internet Al Gore said other wise. So there, you are wrong.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 4:23 am
    Permalink

    At some point, you really have to engage your own intuition and experience and decide for yourself if the planet is shifting. Humans have massively altered the planet; 30% of the birds in North America have disappeared since 1970, and the situation with amphibians is far more dramatic. Have you noticed? Use your own first hand experience if you don't want to believe scientists doing the research… Then DO SOMETHING with your life to benefit all life!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 5:00 am
    Permalink

    NOT a single mention of the phenomenon of Global Dimming proven by pan evaporation models worldwide. When the days become so hot that the days are shortened, then this man credentials shall be to his shame.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 5:15 am
    Permalink

    The Democrats are sure of one thing when it comes to this, the solution.

    That never changes, it was global cooling, then global warming now climate change.

    Yet the answer is always raising taxes and taking control of the economy.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 5:40 am
    Permalink

    I am so glad youtube puts the information box below the video so that I know what is really the truth. NOT!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 6:28 am
    Permalink

    Wikipedia is written by Leftist activists. This many is an actual scientist. Why would YT think anyone would would take the word of error-ridden, biased Wikipedia?

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 9:03 am
    Permalink

    SHE IS the EARTH – He is not – He should not have the overall say on such issues.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 9:08 am
    Permalink

    The Woman Who Discovered the Cause of Global Warming Was Long Overlooked. Her Story Is a Reminder to Champion All Women Leading on Climate – TIME MAGAZINE

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 10:51 am
    Permalink

    Truth ….Check the Sun and cycles… 9/10THS OF A DEGREE IN 100 YEARS..We are in an ice age , but we are burning up !!!!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 1:09 pm
    Permalink

    The climate will change no matter what we do or don’t do!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 1:39 pm
    Permalink

    Best comment here was the one that said : computers=garbage in, garbage out. All the rest of you here that believe what the government(s), government officials and the “scientists” tell you are fools. All these, so called experts, are afraid to lose their job and/or simply want to justify their position and salary so they follow “orders” and the approved narrative. They are also trying to use the so called global warming to control the masses and make money at the same time. Since when do you believe what any government tells you ? Is everything they tell you a bunch of bs except global warming?? Yeah sure, you’re simply naive. I bet you’re all the kind of people that get fascinated by “shinny objects”. Duhhhhhhhhhhhh

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 2:35 pm
    Permalink

    SILLY PEOPLE ON EARTH WHO DONT THINK AND FOOLISHLY THINK WE CAN CHANGE THE CLIMATE WITH CARBON EMISSIONS WHEN CARBON GETS TURNED INTO OXYGEN BY PLANTS AND TREES…GOVT IS A FRAUD TRYIMG TO DRUM UP ANOTHER TAX AND SCARE US INTO GIVING AWAY MORE RIGHTS AND MONEY

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 2:39 pm
    Permalink

    You old heads won't have to deal with the consequences of our actions. The signs and wonders are on the news everyday and still you deny it.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 3:19 pm
    Permalink

    I recommend everybody to try and share this on facebook. See what pops up.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 3:33 pm
    Permalink

    Climate change is satanic religious dogma

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 3:38 pm
    Permalink

    The more humans born everyday are causing the warming of our planet money won't do anything as long as there are more and more humans brought to this planet and that is a fact!!!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 3:43 pm
    Permalink

    His (Patrick Michaels) claims over the last quarter century have been proven wrong repeatedly. In addition, He receives funding from the fossil fuel industry which gives him an interest in supporting the fossil fuel industry. Here we have one source that says one thing, but a million other sources that say the opposite. To believe this one man over the many experts who, without having any fossil fuel funding, disagree with him is foolish.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 5:17 pm
    Permalink

    How many of you stayed awake in science class? Remember the part about our solar system? Remember learning about planets their sizes and distances along with gravitational orbits? Remember how earth is in the "goldylocks zone"? Remember how at one point, Earth had an ice age? Remember being told that the titanus scale of our galaxy works within billion and billions of years for scale? Well,.. Things on this scale work much,much faster than we are taught ,.. Its the reason why all planets are in a elliptical orbit of the massive gravitational pull of the sun. The reason for "ice age" ,.. To far from the sun,.. "goldylock zone",.. Just right,.. "global warming" or "climate change",.. Passing our comfortable "goldylocks zone",.. and entering a global melt down/waterworld,.. Eventually entering a complete vaporization of liquid water to a atmosphere that will drown you. This can not be stopped. The sun has its hold and seeks to devour all planets. The only reason earth is not been drowned by water yet,.. The moon. For every inch we move toward the sun,.. The moon draws us back a centimeter. It only has baught us a small amount of time. Its hinted at in school ,.. however they will not tell you as a child that we are inching closer to the sun daily. And with each passing orbit drawn into the bright inferno. We might have another 1,000 years ,.. 800 of which we survive underground untill earths core is pulled through its crust. Now if they told us that all available resources were going towards outfitting the moon to be a transport for 500,000 humans to another solar system with a planet still in its "goldylocks zone",.. It makes more sense to do everything possible to save human kind.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 6:59 pm
    Permalink

    Proof that a thorough education, driven by confirmation bias, can produce a moron!

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 7:32 pm
    Permalink

    Parameterized. The models too sensitive.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 7:47 pm
    Permalink

    STOP REPUBLICAN GLOBAL BURNING.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 8:01 pm
    Permalink

    In his credentials, the funding Dr Michaels has received from the fossil fuel industry has been conveniently omitted….

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 9:39 pm
    Permalink

    Paramaterised = politicised.

    Reply
  • September 29, 2019 at 10:01 pm
    Permalink

    im sure the planet can hardly wait for humans to exit and then rejuvenate itself

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 2:36 am
    Permalink

    So shame on Fox news to bring this scientists who were paid by huge petroleum corporations and other companies just to show something is not true. There are a thousands of facts that prove that we humans are increasing the climate change. Always had green gases emissions , but it was always natural and the nature always with its balance controlled that. Now with the humans interferences things are out of control. There are thousands of solutions for this issue. But those companies pays those kind of people to lie and people still believe it. They just turn on their Fox Fake news and dont check facts. Its has been proven that clean energy employs more people than petroleum companies por example, but one more time people are blind. The bill is coming and we are gonna pay the price on this future. And that's when I come back on this video and says I said so.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 3:16 am
    Permalink

    When

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 4:16 am
    Permalink

    OK all you morons out there listen up!

    In an affidavit in a Vermont court case, Michaels described his firm's "mission" as being to "publicize findings on climate change and scientific and social perspectives that may not otherwise appear in the popular literature or media. This entails both response research and public commentary."[3] In effect, New Hope Environmental Services is a PR firm. Michaels' firm does not disclose who its clients are, but leaked documents have revealed that several were power utilities which operate coal power stations. On a 2007 academic CV, Michaels disclosed that prior to creating his firm he had received funding from the Edison Electric Institute and the Western Fuels Association. He has also been a frequent speaker with leading coal and energy companies as well as coal and other industry lobby groups.[4

    Who are you going to believe? Fossil fuel funded cranks or the rest of the science community? Yeah admit it dumb asses, you’ve been hoodwinked. Truth, Liberty, Levin!!!

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 7:50 am
    Permalink

    This so called expert is talking about the excess Co2 in the first half of the 20th century not being from human activity? Does he know when the Industrial Revolution began? Does he understand the levels of deliberate deforestation (trees soak up Co2) that's gone on across the globe at our hands? Does he recognise the volumes of carbon based fuels that have been burned by humanity? Has he studied the pollution accumulasted from modern intensive agricultural practises?

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 11:59 am
    Permalink

    New Balance
    The brand for real men.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 1:40 pm
    Permalink

    Oh My God……Get ready to Run you Lefty Loons….It's Global Warming……A Record CAT 5 Hurricane and Record Snow of 48" at the same time….Oh My God the World is coming to an End……..LMFAO!!!!

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 1:40 pm
    Permalink

    Face book is saying this is fake news just a fyi to fox.. I

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 2:39 pm
    Permalink

    This movement became a cartoon of itself when it turned itself into a doomsday cult. Watch Dan Pena dissect it. There isn't a single bank that refuses to underwrite a beachfront mortgage on the basis of global warming and it's dire consequences. If there really was a risk of rising the oceans in the next 12 years, do you think Barclay's bank will give you a million dollars? They know it won't happen. So do the obamas, with their shiny new beach front mansion on Martha's Vineyard.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 4:06 pm
    Permalink

    So ironic having him on here discussing this when he's not only a well known climate science denier, but is funded by the oil companies.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 4:31 pm
    Permalink

    Just a thought
    Remove all the things that shade the earth will the suffice temp rize?

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 5:12 pm
    Permalink

    Is this the comedy channel?

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 6:02 pm
    Permalink

    after Sept. 2019 , if you still need someone to tell you, then you must be hopelessly stupid

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 6:35 pm
    Permalink

    The guest in this video lost his job at the CATO Institute in May 2019. Think for yourself folks. Always listen to ALL sides of any discussion and make up your own mind based on the science involved. It may be complicated involving detailed science. Try to keep "politics" out of your reasoning. Your grandchildren will learn if climate change is real.

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 7:32 pm
    Permalink

    The locked up room elephant is that N👀NE KNOWS HOW TO STOP OR CHANGE CHANGES IN CLIMATE..(if it is real).NOT ONE!!!💢❌❗™®

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 8:03 pm
    Permalink

    my scooter can reach 50mph -and 65 eventually :}. can i compare it with a street bike that reaches that speed in 3sec, can i state that they're both fast?
    while the planet's cold and warm cycles are a well studied subject and it's a fact that both warmer and colder temperatures occurred in the past, we also need to understand that the time frames are also important. the planet hasn't warmed up this fast in the past. not even close.

    missing key information can make something illogical appear to make sense. :}

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 8:44 pm
    Permalink

    Been goin on for years. Keep the people fighting amongst themselves …..

    Reply
  • September 30, 2019 at 11:05 pm
    Permalink

    But but… now I won't be able to stick my nose up at everyone that isn't driving a prius!!
    I need something new to feel entitled about!! Quick, before im just some average schmuck!

    Reply
  • October 1, 2019 at 12:11 am
    Permalink

    Everyone needs to hear this!!!!!

    Reply
  • October 1, 2019 at 2:16 am
    Permalink

    The Russians have 10% as much money yet for some ungodly reason their technology seems to be a step ahead of ours.

    Reply
  • October 1, 2019 at 4:32 am
    Permalink

    I searched "greta thurnberg" into YouTube, and ALL results are from left-wing mainstream media, and ALL are pro-greta. No anti-greta videos show up.

    Search results are totally manipulated.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *